25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

rec.humor
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor?hl=en

rec.humor@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Two days
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/be16f8b4c2a63696?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 6:03 am
From: "Greg Evans"

MosNot wrote:

>>>>> <click, click, click>
>>>> Is that the sound of an elevator?
>>> ....um....I'm learning to tap dance ?
>> You certainly managed to tapdance your way around
>> answering that question.
>
> Tallented.

Better than being shortented...

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 6:03 am
From: "Greg Evans"

SummersFrenzy wrote:

> Ents are usually quite tall . . . but they're also
> somewhat slow to move .. . I think tap dancing might be
> out of their capacity

I'd pay a dollar to see that!

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 8:09 am
From: "Greg Evans"

Elisabeth Mueller wrote:

>>> Speak up.
>> But they're not above me, they're in front of me! Besides,
>> won't they think I'm pompous and snobbish with my nose
>> in the air?
>
> You are right. Maybe you should speak down.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: surrender
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/c802089baaf3b7ea?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 6:05 am
From: "Greg Evans"

Larry Krzewinski wrote:

> I could go on and on.

And often do.

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:22 am
From: "MosNot"

"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
news:o4fdj3pepavhviqbv03885sbfllt90kpm4@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:41:15 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> I told the truth when I said "I never agree with Mos about nothing".
>>>>>>> So there!
>>>>>>Your use of a double negative then indicates that you agree with him
>>>>>>about
>>>>>>everything . . . 'k, interesting concept
>>>>> You're taking it out of context, dog gone it!
>>>>
>>>>Ooo, totally new concept !
>>>
>>> It is so not new. I do it all the time.
>>
>>You do not do totally new concepts.
>
> 1: KA-ching! Pay that setup fee, kid.

Are you sure you did the set up ?

> That's just a few. I could go on and on. And on and on and on and on
> etc.

You do, you do, you do, you do, you do, you do, you do..................

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 11:02 am
From: Larry Krzewinski

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:05:14 -0500, "Greg Evans"
<gregevansREMOVE@charterBLATHER.net> wrote:

>> I could go on and on.
>
>And often do.

Go on.

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 11:03 am
From: Larry Krzewinski

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:22:19 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
wrote:

>> 1: KA-ching! Pay that setup fee, kid.
>
>Are you sure you did the set up ?

I can honestly say that you have me to thank for all the setup fees.

>> That's just a few. I could go on and on. And on and on and on and on
>> etc.
>
>You do, you do, you do, you do, you do, you do, you do..................

I know, I know, I know, I know. <sob>

==============================================================================
TOPIC: MI5 Persecution: Leicester Square 9/2/98 (13405)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/9b2629ffad53c00c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 2:33 am
From: MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk

Leicester Square - 9/Feb/1998

In February 1998 I spent some time in Leicester Square, in the West End
of London. This is a very busy area of London, and one which can be relied
on to produce "contacts". Capital Radio's offices and their cafe are
located here, the Trocadero is nearby, and the place is full of cinemas
and entertainment venues.

Certainty level: 100%

A young girl is heard to say, "Alright I'm going to talk to myself" to her
friends, followed by all of them laughing together, as I passed by.

Believe me, I do not look mad in real life, these young people would not
have directed their comments and laughter at me unless they had already
been told by others that I was ill. I am absolutely certain that their
behaviour was directed at me, and this audio file is particularly clear.

Certainty level: 60%

This one was recorded in a cafe in Green Park. Two women are talking to
each other, one of them says to the other, "something wrong with him",
with an emphasis on the "wrong".

The words "something wrong with him" have been repeated at me dozens of
times, at my former workplace in Canada, in England, etc. The words are
quite deliberately chosen to have two meanings; they obviously imply that
I am ill, without forcing the abusers to demean themselves by using
more pejorative terms, although they have shown that they have no
compunction in that area; and secondly, the words "wrong ... him" make
me at fault, and place the guilt for the abusers' wrongdoing on my
shoulders.

Certainty level: 30%

Recorded on a Victoria line tube train leaving Green Park station.
If you listen carefully you can pick up the word "hunchback". The speaker
had emitted a swear word immediately before this excerpt; both the swear
word, and the "hunchback", were (I believe) directed at me.

13405

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Going shopping
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/8bb216a758bd2e20?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 6:58 am
From: "SummersFrenzy"

MosNot wrote:
> SummersFrenzy wrote:
>
>> It was more clever than mine . . .also reasonably nice . . . whadda you
>> want?
>
> You don't really want to know.

Oh, I might want to know - if you really wanted to say . . . ya never know

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Chinese food
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/2450e65bb085dfcf?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 7:32 am
From: Elisabeth Mueller

Larry Krzewinski schrieb:

>On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:35:03 -0800, "ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.org>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>> Der Werwolf!
>>>>>
>>>>> des Weswolfs ...
>>>>
>>>> Nein! Der Werwolfski.
>>>
>>> I forgot you decline Polish.
>>
>>He can't even decline verbs.
>
>I says no to verbs.

You do this the honest, hard way.

== 2 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 7:32 am
From: Elisabeth Mueller

ynotssor schrieb:

>In news:g0i9j3tas33qd2fr6e8rkh0s0s5b16q0h6@4ax.com,
>Elisabeth Mueller <maelmill@eunet.at> wrote:
>
>>>>> Let me climb all the way out of this pod and I'll prove it to you.
>>>>
>>>> Let me help you there. I will hold your other tentacle.
>>>
>>> You misspelled te ... well, maybe not.
>>
>> I misspell a lot in my old days, but I recognize a tentacle when I see
>> one.
>
>You have twenty-thousand legumes under there, I sea.

Too bad you are a nobody.

== 3 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 7:32 am
From: Elisabeth Mueller

ynotssor schrieb:

>In news:u4i9j3tmjqhnrbeifd3sf2ih86okn3n4ll@4ax.com,
>Elisabeth Mueller <maelmill@eunet.at> wrote:
>
>>>>> Der Werwolf!
>>>>
>>>> des Weswolfs ...
>>>
>>> Nein! Der Werwolfski.
>>
>> I forgot you decline Polish.
>
>He can't even decline verbs.

Me neither.

== 4 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 8:06 am
From: "Greg Evans"

ynotssor wrote:

> You have twenty-thousand legumes under there, I sea.

Are you calling Elisabeth a washed-up has-bean??

== 5 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:16 am
From: "MosNot"

"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
news:esfdj3plpt6j73vs943s38p229knqmi2j4@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:30:38 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
> wrote:
>
>>>>> Am not!
>>>>
>>>>You am, I am not.
>>>
>>> Ok. I think, therefore what's your excuse?
>>
>>Excuse ? Feh. I have reasons.
>
> Name 28 of them.

You still haven't caught on about
trying to tell me what to do, huh.
If I wanted to be told what to do,
I'd join the Army. Or get married.

== 6 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:17 am
From: "MosNot"

"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
news:2ufdj318o5vp5ihkbav2tr8eb03nm2t7br@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:31:43 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not any more. Now we're in this now, not that now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then, ya goof
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. Glad I'm not the
>>>>>>>>>>>> only one that understands it.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is where I'm supposed to note: "say again?"
>>>>>>>>>> Again.
>>>>>>>>> Thank you. Now for something completely different . . . THEN
>>>>>>>>Jeez, is that going to lead to more "now" stuff ?
>>>>>>> And now for something completely different...
>>>>>>Been there, done that already . . . you were late, now it's then
>>>>> Then I was late. Why make such a big deal about it now?
>>>>She didn't now. She did then.
>>>
>>> You did now, she did it then.
>>
>>No, I did it then, but not now.
>
> No more now!

Well, now, what then ?

== 7 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 11:04 am
From: Larry Krzewinski

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:16:59 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
wrote:

>>>>>> Am not!
>>>>>
>>>>>You am, I am not.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. I think, therefore what's your excuse?
>>>
>>>Excuse ? Feh. I have reasons.
>>
>> Name 28 of them.
>
>You still haven't caught on about
>trying to tell me what to do, huh.
>If I wanted to be told what to do,
>I'd join the Army. Or get married.

You couldn't even name one of them?

== 8 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 11:04 am
From: Larry Krzewinski

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:17:33 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not any more. Now we're in this now, not that now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then, ya goof
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. Glad I'm not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only one that understands it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is where I'm supposed to note: "say again?"
>>>>>>>>>>> Again.
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. Now for something completely different . . . THEN
>>>>>>>>>Jeez, is that going to lead to more "now" stuff ?
>>>>>>>> And now for something completely different...
>>>>>>>Been there, done that already . . . you were late, now it's then
>>>>>> Then I was late. Why make such a big deal about it now?
>>>>>She didn't now. She did then.
>>>>
>>>> You did now, she did it then.
>>>
>>>No, I did it then, but not now.
>>
>> No more now!
>
>Well, now, what then ?

Then nothing.

== 9 of 9 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 11:05 am
From: Larry Krzewinski

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:32:16 +0100, Elisabeth Mueller
<maelmill@eunet.at> wrote:

>>>>>>> Der Werwolf!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> des Weswolfs ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Nein! Der Werwolfski.
>>>>
>>>> I forgot you decline Polish.
>>>
>>>He can't even decline verbs.
>>
>>I says no to verbs.
>
>You do this the honest, hard way.

Are you kidding?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: MI5 Persecution: BA984 LHR->TXL 13/6/98 (15579)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/b08a12615170d9e1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 3:37 am
From: MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk

BA984 LHR->TXL 13/June/1998

Certainty level: 100%

In June 1998 I travelled on the above British Airways flight to Berlin
with my mother, to visit her family. There were two women in seats 30D/E,
about 4/5 rows behind us. It was quite obvious from the torrent of abuse
during these flight that these women had been instructed to harass me
and attempt to obtain a reaction.

I did manage to record much of the flight, but unfortunately much of the
recording is unclear because of high background noise on the aircraft.
The following three excerpts from the recording are the best I can do.

The segment at position 11:34 minutes on my recording contains a fairly
quiet word "paranoid", followed immediately by a much louder
"yeah, he's paranoid, yeah". During the flight the abuse was not sexual,
as it so often is elsewhere, but attacking my mental health.

One of the women in seats 30D/E said "paranoid" very clearly towards the
end of the flight, but unfortunately I had run out of minidisc space and
stopped recording by then. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that
these women were directed to harass me. This harassment happens without
fail on British Airways flights; I've been on something like three or
four BA flights in the last 5 years and it's happened each time.
Presumably this is because of international law which says incidents on
aircraft during flight are actionable in the airline's country of
origin - so my persecutors want a reaction from me, and they want to see
me "done" in the UK where they can influence the justice system.

These incidents never happen on foreign-domiciled carriers.

15579

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Scottish Dentist
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/2816be6690c592af?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 8:08 am
From: "Greg Evans"

Elisabeth Mueller wrote:

>>>>> Let's drink together.
>>>> I'll drink to that.
>>> You have the best ideas!
>> <raises glass in silent toast>
>
> I am glad you bread does not talk.

It's too baked to respond.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 7:00 am
From: "SummersFrenzy"

MosNot wrote:
> SummersFrenzy wrote:
>
>> Definition of neurotic: building castles in the air and dreaming about
>> living in them.
>> Definition of psychotic: building castles in the air; then moving in and
>> setting up house.
>> So ya see, the psychos don't really care - they're too busy enjoying
>> their castles.
>
> Then you won't mind if we lump you in with Larry.

I only qualify as neurotic . . . haven't crossed the boundaries to psycho
quite yet - all appearances to the contrary

So yeah . . . I'd mind

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 12:44 pm
From: "SummersFrenzy"

Larry Krzewinski wrote:
>
> I under stand all!

Interesting break and usage . . . so you're short, eh? Do you suffer from
short man's syndrome?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Stupid Mistake
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/browse_thread/thread/6d770b0b3fcbb8e8?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 8:10 am
From: "Greg Evans"

SummersFrenzy wrote:

>>> . . . but it was such a good/easy line
>> The kind that people around here usually charge exorbitant
>> fees for setting up, yes.
>
> I don't believe in charging fees for that - too much like
> prostitution . . . So, I'm generous

You know what they call people who willingly give it away for free...

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:19 am
From: "MosNot"

"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
news:m4edj3531ev1enajrv86dsjv7nu0l5ookd@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:26:30 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
>>>>> Free love with Summer, guys!
>>>>> I call first!
>>>>Well, it would be rude just to show up.
>>> Are you calling second?
>>Already there.
>
> You're too late.

You're premature.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:20 am
From: "MosNot"

"Greg Evans" <gregevansREMOVE@charterBLATHER.net> wrote in message
news:5ponqvFsh39jU1@mid.individual.net...
> SummersFrenzy wrote:
>
>>>> . . . but it was such a good/easy line
>>> The kind that people around here usually charge exorbitant
>>> fees for setting up, yes.
>>
>> I don't believe in charging fees for that - too much like
>> prostitution . . . So, I'm generous
>
> You know what they call people who willingly give it away for free...

Happily single.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.humor"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.humor-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.humor/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en

Posted by NrSD, Minggu, 11 November 2007 12.49

0 Comments:

<< Home | << Add a comment

25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

Archives

Previous Post